Reprising the part of this that the last few posts have moved away from:
That is right, and it stops being right at the edges. The general case is well behaved; the interesting cases in this thread are all at the boundary where the general case breaks.
A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:
What did you change at the same time, and can you separate the two now?
jason_paloalto said:That is right, and it stops being right at the edges.
I read this differently from jason_paloalto, on substance rather than tone. I would resist the confidence. Half of what this board was certain about two years ago has since been quietly dropped, and nobody went back to correct the threads.
PeptideDetective — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View Resultsjason_paloalto said:That is right, and it stops being right at the edges.
True, with the qualification that this is a self-selected group. The people for whom it did not work post less, and that shapes everything we think we know.
I would rather be corrected than agreed with, if it comes to it.
jason_paloalto said:That is right, and it stops being right at the edges.
Bookmarking. The distinction being drawn above is the one nobody else makes.