Jan 21, 2025 at 8:23 PM#16
jim_asheville said:The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person.
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth. The detail I would add is minor and it is already implied above.
41 14CryptoCarl, MariaRD, AussieAnna and 38 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Jan 21, 2025 at 10:25 PM#17
DoseLogDan said:The boring version of this is the one that works, and the boring version is: measure a baseline, change one variable, wait, measure again under the…
Saving this. It is the first explanation that did not require me to already understand it. I will report back once I have actually tried it.
Last edited: Jan 22, 2025 at 1:25 AM
42 15AmyNC_wife, SkepticalSean, Dr.CardioMD and 39 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Jan 22, 2025 at 12:27 AM#18
Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.
43 16ricardo_MIA, BrianDallas92, labquiet_amy and 40 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
PeptideDetective — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsJan 22, 2025 at 2:29 AM#19
carl_compliance said:There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.
Adding a me-too, because a thread of one person's experience is not much use.
Last edited: Jan 22, 2025 at 4:29 AM
44 17PharmacoVig_BOS, SurmountFan_IN, PeptideChemSF and 41 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report