ingrid_STO said:The honest answer is that the effect is real, the magnitude is contested, and the individual variation is larger than either.
ingrid_STO has the substance of this right. The condition it depends on is worth stating. Yes, and the corollary is less popular: if the reasoning holds, it also holds where it produces an answer we do not like.
RetaRick_CA said:The meal advice is right and incomplete without the hydration point.
Saving this. It is the first explanation that did not require me to already understand it. I will report back once I have actually tried it.
ingrid_STO said:The honest answer is that the effect is real, the magnitude is contested, and the individual variation is larger than either.
I read this differently from ingrid_STO, on substance rather than tone. This treats a plausible mechanism as a demonstrated one. Plausible is where you start looking, not where you stop.
PeptideDetective — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsThe figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way. Most of the apparent contradictions in these threads dissolve at that step.
Moderator note: leaving this open. It is being argued well and the disagreement is the useful part. Report rather than reply if it drifts again.