Reprising the part of this that the last few posts have moved away from:
It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false. If nothing would look different, it is not a claim about the world and no amount of discussion will settle it.
Dr.LeslieOBGYN said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
Can confirm. Same sequence, different timescale.
Dr.LeslieOBGYN said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. Take it one variable at a time. Almost every unanswerable question in these threads is unanswerable because three things changed in the same fortnight, and no amount of subsequent argument can untangle them after the fact.
Correct me if the detail matters more than I have assumed.
Janoshik Analytical — Independent Testing
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesGL Biochem (Shanghai) Ltd. — Direct Manufacturer
Est. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemModerator note: good thread. Keeping it here rather than moving it, because the question is general enough to be useful. No action needed from anybody.
Following on from Dr.LeslieOBGYN — and this may be the naive question:
Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?