NauseaFreeNow said:Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it.
This was answered several pages up and is worth repeating rather than re-litigating:
The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked. Narrow it and it becomes tractable; leave it broad and the thread will produce nine confident and incompatible replies.
Coming back to something from earlier in the thread, because it keeps being talked past:
Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason. In three months the reason is what you will have forgotten, and the reason is what makes the record worth having.
Following on from NauseaFreeNow — and this may be the naive question:
Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?
PeptideDetective — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsDanielChem_CHI said:Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason.
I am going to disagree with the direction of travel here. The thread has converged on the tidiest answer rather than the best-supported one, and those are not the same thing.
DanielChem_CHI said:Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason.
No disagreement, though it depends on where somebody is starting from, and this thread has been assuming a starting point nobody stated.