hank_denver said:Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.
True, and it depends on a baseline nobody has stated. Without knowing where someone started, the same number can be an excellent result or a disappointing one.
hank_denver said:Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.
That reframing is the part I needed.
Moderator note: leaving this open. It is being argued well and the disagreement is the useful part. No action needed from anybody.
Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsCanadaChris said:True, and it depends on a baseline nobody has stated.
Same experience, arrived at from the opposite direction. Posting only so the count is not one.
CanadaChris said:True, and it depends on a baseline nobody has stated.
Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion. Almost every disagreement here turns out to be two people measuring different things and comparing the numbers anyway.