rachel_ABQ said:Most of what circulates confidently in this community traces back to one summary of one study, and the qualifier was dropped somewhere in the third…
Same experience, arrived at from the opposite direction. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.
Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions. Agreeing that something happens says nothing about whether it happens enough to act on.
Dr.BariatricHTX said:The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions.
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth. The detail I would add is minor and it is already implied above.
Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsDr.BariatricHTX said:The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions.
Coming at Dr.BariatricHTX’s question from a different direction. If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not. That is answerable; arguing about which sounds more plausible is not.