NurseKim_ATL said:Bayesian meta-analysis perspective on the trial evidence: traditional frequentist meta-analyses report point estimates and confidence intervals.
That is right for the common case. Whether it is right for the case being asked about depends on a detail that has not been given.
pam_columbus said:labquiet_amy said: ...regarding the trial evidence...
Thank you — that is the clearest version of this I have read, and I have read a lot of them. Taking it to my next appointment.
NurseKim_ATL said:Bayesian meta-analysis perspective on the trial evidence: traditional frequentist meta-analyses report point estimates and confidence intervals.
I read this differently. The confidence in this thread is running ahead of the evidence, and I would rather the uncertainty were stated than smoothed over because it is unsatisfying.
PeptideDetective — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsOne concrete data point for the thread. Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath. An edited-away mistake is invisible to the next person who makes it.
Moderator note: two posts asking for a source have been merged into one. Please search the thread before asking again. No action needed from anybody.