labquiet_amy said:One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it.
I read this differently. The confidence in this thread is running ahead of the evidence, and I would rather the uncertainty were stated than smoothed over because it is unsatisfying.
labquiet_amy said:One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it.
Right, and the exception is worth naming rather than left implied, because the exception is where people get into trouble.
labquiet_amy said:One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it.
Bookmarking. The distinction being drawn above is the one nobody else makes. Taking it to my next appointment.
PeptideDetective — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsFrom the other side of the consultation, briefly. It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false. If nothing would look different, it is not a claim about the world and no amount of discussion will settle it.
pat_auckland said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so out loud.