Jun 8, 2024 at 6:07 PM#41
One concrete data point for the thread. Give anything pharmacological four weeks before you judge it, and give anything measured weekly a four-point rolling average before you call it a trend.
Last edited: Jun 8, 2024 at 10:07 PM
3 3mike_mealprep, NicoleRaleigh, james_edin
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Jun 9, 2024 at 2:28 AM#42
One thing that is still open after SarahChen_PharmD’s answer:
What would you measure differently if you were starting again?
2 2lucas_SP_BR, lisa_labSD
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsJun 9, 2024 at 7:08 PM#44
dave_SLC said:Give anything pharmacological four weeks before you judge it, and give anything measured weekly a four-point rolling average before you call it a…
That is right, and it stops being right at the edges. The general case is well behaved; the interesting cases in this thread are all at the boundary where the general case breaks.
50 0TomFromTexas, mike.trainer_LA, sarah_nash92 and 47 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Jun 10, 2024 at 3:28 AM#45
dave_SLC said:Give anything pharmacological four weeks before you judge it, and give anything measured weekly a four-point rolling average before you call it a…
This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else. Adding it to my notes with a link back to this thread.
49 24marcus_mpls, DeniseRN_TPA, SandraNC_45 and 46 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report