Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false. If nothing would look different, it is not a claim about the world and no amount of discussion will settle it.
Happy to go further on any of that.
Dr.GutHealth said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
Same experience, arrived at from the opposite direction. The detail I would add is minor and it is already implied above.
Dr.GutHealth said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
Coming at Dr.GutHealth’s question from a different direction. There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.
PeptideDetective — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsOne concrete data point for the thread. For anyone reading later: the numbers in this thread are worth checking against a primary source before you act on them, including mine. Half the figures circulating in this community trace back to a secondary summary that dropped a qualifier.
Following on from Dr.GutHealth — and this may be the naive question:
How would you tell the difference between that and the alternative explanation?