julia.endo said:Update since I posted: I held at 1.7mg for a further twelve weeks and lost another 4kg slowly, which settles it for me.
Pushing back on julia.endo here. I would resist the confidence. Half of what this board was certain about two years ago has since been quietly dropped, and nobody went back to correct the threads.
julia.endo said:Update since I posted: I held at 1.7mg for a further twelve weeks and lost another 4kg slowly, which settles it for me.
True, and it depends on a baseline nobody has stated. Without knowing where someone started, the same number can be an excellent result or a disappointing one.
julia.endo said:Update since I posted: I held at 1.7mg for a further twelve weeks and lost another 4kg slowly, which settles it for me.
Thank you for spelling out the reasoning rather than just the conclusion. Printing the relevant bit and taking it with me.
Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsClinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any. If nothing would, the discussion is not about evidence, and it is better to say so early than to spend nine posts discovering it.
PeptideChemSF said:It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any.
This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so out loud.