BenResearch_OR said:Update, and it is the boring outcome: nothing was wrong.
This is where I part company with the consensus forming above. Filing an objection on the n=1 problem. Personal experience is genuine evidence about one person and very weak evidence about anybody else, and this thread keeps promoting the first into the second.
BenResearch_OR said:Update, and it is the boring outcome: nothing was wrong.
Agreed on the substance. I would put less weight on the timescale, because two months of anything is not enough to distinguish a trend from a wobble.
Happy to go further on any of that.
BenResearch_OR said:Update, and it is the boring outcome: nothing was wrong.
Saving this. It is the first explanation that did not require me to already understand it. I will report back once I have actually tried it.
PeptideDetective — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsFrom the other side of the consultation, briefly. It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false. If nothing would look different, it is not a claim about the world and no amount of discussion will settle it.
anders_CPH said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
Adding a me-too, because a thread of one person's experience is not much use.