The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look. It is a small discipline and it changes what you notice.
Following on from Dr.ObesityMed — and this may be the naive question:
Did your prescriber agree with that reading, and if not what was their objection?
Dr.PathRoch said:Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.
Pushing back on Dr.PathRoch here. This treats a plausible mechanism as a demonstrated one. Plausible is where you start looking, not where you stop.
Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsDr.PathRoch said:Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.
Agreed, and the size of the effect matters as much as its existence. Something real and small gets treated here as though it were real and decisive.
Dr.PathRoch said:Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.
That reframing is the part I needed. Adding it to my notes with a link back to this thread.