LabKate said:Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.
No disagreement, though the timescale matters more than the mechanism here. Most of what looks like a difference in kind turns out to be a difference in how long somebody waited.
LabKate said:Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.
This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else.
Moderator note: good thread. Keeping it here rather than moving it, because the question is general enough to be useful. Report rather than reply if it drifts again.
Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsTrialTracker_MD said:No disagreement, though the timescale matters more than the mechanism here.
Same experience, arrived at from the opposite direction. Posting only so the count is not one.
TrialTracker_MD said:No disagreement, though the timescale matters more than the mechanism here.
Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. The honest answer is that the effect is real, the magnitude is contested, and the individual variation is larger than either. Those three things can all be true at once, and most arguments here are two people holding different parts of that.
Happy to go further on any of that.